Showing posts with label Banzai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Banzai. Show all posts

29 June 2011

Banzai! 2010 Catch-Up, Part III



Hereafter

Starring Matt Damon, Cecile de France, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jay Mohr, Richard Kind, Frankie McLaren, George McLaren, Derek Jacobi
Written by Peter Morgan
Directed by Clint Eastwood
Release: 22 October 2010
Warner Bros., 129 mins., Rated R

Plot: Three people who have experiences with death first hand are gradually brought together to help one another.

Visions of the afterlife is a tricky subject, and having a story that weaves multiple characters and plotlines together in the climax is just as tricky, but amazingly, Hereafter overcomes the possibility of corniness or failure and instead becomes a rather engrossing movie with some phenomenal and sadly overlooked performances.

For a film that gained some Oscar buzz pre-release, Hereafter didn't come anywhere near the Twin Cities, so sadly a DVD rental was my resort. It's unfortunate, because the film opens with a utterly spectacular nine-minute CG-heavy tsunami scene that propels one character into her familiar arc: a woman who 'visits' the afterlife, gets a glimpse behind the curtain, as it were, and is now consumed with finding out as much information as she can about it. Records and testimonies of folks who claim to have glimpsed the afterlife, like her. Marie's story seems to be the glue, but the beautiful and successful thing about Hereafter is that each story compliments and doesn't overshadow the others. They need each other, and the film wisely inter-cuts between these arcs, one never overstaying its welcome. So Marie is the investigator, and there's George (Damon), a man who is able to channel the afterlife with great concentration and the touch of ones hands. A tortured soul like anyone with a gift, George doesn't tend to socialize much, and has come to be angry at his abilities. What George can do makes him a target of interest to a young boy in London, Marcus (McLaren) who recently lost his brother and seeks George's assistance to make a connection. With these three storylines set up, Eastwood and Morgan nicely intercuts between them rather smoothly, each story having sufficient time to develop, none of them feeling forced or lacking in screentime.

The characters are interesting, no doubt, and the best thing that can be said about the actors is that we're not looking at Matt Damon or Cecile de France or Bryce Dallas Howard or what have you, but the characters themselves. The actor shell slides away and we have the characters. That's quite the accomplishment, I daresay. Dark, somber, quiet, George and Marcus are similar in that respect, both looking to forge their own lives out of death. And Marie wants to move on, but feels compelled to make her experience widely known.

Competently written and directed, Hereafter is a solid and interesting film exploring life after death and how it affects the living for those who have glimpsed behind the curtain. Fascinating, really. And although a part of me feels that Hereafter doesn't push the envelope enough, more intent on character over musings on the afterlife (and understandably so), it's a engaging story and film. Sadly overlooked, if you have the chance to check it out, do so.

Rating: 7/10 = Interesting drama of loved ones lost, what's not to dig?


I Love You, Phillip Morris

Starring Jim Carrey, Ewan McGregor, Leslie Mann, Rodrigo Santoro.
Written & Directed by Glenn Ficarra, John Requa
Release: 3 December 2010
EuropaCorp, 93 mins., Rated R

Plot: While incarcerated, Russell falls in love with fellow inmate Phillip Morris, and once on the outside, they plan a life together that doesn't exactly go as planned.

Unrelated note related to I Love You, Phillip Morris: this aging Jim Carrey has a sort of creepy appeal to him, so instead of comedy films (and utter shit like this penguin childrens garbage out this summer) Carrey could easily flex his acting muscles as a serial killer. He has the look for it, and his aged face and crazy eyes could definitely sell the role. Alright, onwards to I Love You, Phillip Morris.

Basically, it was "okay." One of those shoulder-shrugging, "Yeah, I saw it" type flicks where you can't honestly say you feel one way or another about it. The thing is, I was looking forward to it. The opportunity to see Jim Carrey stretch out his acting muscles, and to see the blossoming love life of Jim Carrey and motherfrakking Obi-Wan Kenobi - how could I not be enticed? To the films credit, there are some genuine moments where the couple are really good - and dare I use the word cute - together, and their relationship feels momentarily real and strong. McGregor's Phillip Morris, however, isn't a strong character, and is very much regulated to the sidelines, hardly standing out as a person other than to be the object of Carrey's desire. Rather amazingly, though, Carrey does steal the film, and not in a over-the-top-look-at-me-I'm-incredibly-obnoxious kind of way. Yes, he does have a tendency to be a little loud and aggressive with his mannerisms and expressions, but it is one of Carrey's more subdued and honest performances to date. Russell is a fantastic character who can't help take some money from a company or two unjustly, and tends to get caught a lot. His personality definitely holds this movie upright, but ultimately, when the film is about Russell and Morris together, it doesn't soar. It's best and most enjoyable when Carrey is pulling off one of his cons and escapes from confinement (once again).

This being a comedy, I guess it might be best rating the "ha ha"'s. There are some moments that bring on the laughter, but for the most part, I found handing over a chuckle or two. I Love You, Phillip Morris has its flaws, but its heart is at the right place, and Carrey is loads of fun (although scary to look at), so it's worth a rental. Not a blind buy by any means, but a rental most definitely.

Rating: 6/10 = Flawed here and there with Carrey ringing in the laughter, the film could benefit from a tighter, funnier script, but for what it is, Phillip Morris is lovable enough.


Love and Other Drugs

Starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Anne Hathway, Josh Gad, Judy Greer, Gabriel Macht, Oliver Platt, Hank Azaria, George Segal, Jill Clayburgh
Written by Edward Zwick, Charles Randolph, Marshall Herskovitz
Directed by Edward Zwick
Release: 24 November 2010
20th Century Fox, 112 mins., Rated R

Plot: Jamie shags Maggie, Jamie falls for Maggie, Maggie falls for Jamie, Maggie 'grr' cos she has Parkinsons, makes relationship difficult...love!

NAKED ANNE HATHAWAY! NAKED ANNE HATHAWAY! NAKED ANNE HATHAWAY!

Alright, now that the prime motivator for checking out Love and Other Drugs has been established, let's talk about the movie itself. Overall, not bad. But the general consensus that the film is 'uneven' does have some merit. The films tone seem to hit different marks, never really seeming to be organic but instead just out-of-placey. That said, aside from a script that could use a bit of a sprucing upping, Edward Zwick's love story ain't bad, and I ain't got no complaints.

I appreciate Anne Hathaway's Maggie Murdock being a sort of anti-social, no bullshit kind of woman, who just wants a meaningless shag here and there and is a tad grumpy at her deteriorating state, and Hathaway portrays the character wonderfully. Similarly, Gyllenhaal perfects the womanizing Jamie who uses his Jedi powers to charm women into bed. When these two characters meet, one can't help but be pulled in. In regards to romantic comedies or dramas, I tend to concentrate more on the chemistry and story of the film over its technical value. For example, I'm not exactly going to be judging Zwick's directing style like I analyze Nolan's perfect and gorgeous cinematography in The Dark Knight. Taking that into account, I gotta say, Love and Other Drugs is quite successful. Yes, we have two quasi-formulaic characters undergoing a formulaic film: the womanizer, the sorta-artsy-bitch, they mingle and eventually like each other, and love is hand - The End. It's how their story is handled and the performances of both Hathaway and Gyllenhaal that save the film.

I love that Jamie and Maggie recognize that their relationship isn't going to be easy, that there's going to be some seriously tough shit heading their way, and I love that Jamie accepts that and chooses to go through with it. Oops, does that constitute a spoiler? Sure, I could have done without the super-facepalm-groan-ugh-worthy-cliched-man-stopping-car/bus-with-girl-inside bit, but hell, whatever. If I was the screenwriter, I maybe would have changed that bit, but otherwise, very well written. The gradual progress of their hookups turning into a sort of dating and eventually cementing into full on passionate love was great to see, and definitely one of the films highlights. Love and Other Drugs definitely calls for some improvement in the script area, but Hathaway and Gyllenhaal are so fun to watch, I'll nearly let it slide.

Nearly. The film could be so much more fun and interesting, but it doesn't really seem to take off. It became a One Time Watched film, where it doesn't necessarily call for another viewing anytime soon or down the line. And that's a bummer to say. Hell, with the exception of Tangled (review below), none of these films escape the One Time Watched syndrome (should come up with a better name).

Rating: 6.5/10 = A gorgeous Anne Hathaway and charming Jake Gyllenhaal sell a film that is a fine piece of entertainment, but I can't help but feel the film could be so much more.


Tangled

Featuring the voices of Zachary Levi, Mandy Moore, Donna Murphy, Ron Pearlman
Written by Dan Fogelman
Directed by Nathan Greno, Byron Howard
Release: 24 November 2010
Walt Disney Pictures, 100 mins., Rated PG

Plot: Rapunzel wants to get out of her prisoner/tower, and opportunity arises as thief Flynn Rider comes to save the day!

TANGLED is loads and loads of supergigantic loads of fun. Why? The horse Maximus. A true testament to the brilliance of animation, Maximus boasts the best facial expressions, physical gags, and hilarious situations that I've seen in a long, long time. Maximus is the true heart of gold in this movie, and if it wasn't for him - and Rapunzel's chameleon Pascal - TANGLED wouldn't be nearly as fun. I know, I know, horrible thing to say. Sure, Rapunzel and Flynn Rider are great characters - especially Rapunzel (more on that in a sec), but I guess what I'll be taking away from TANGLED more is these two creatures, Maximus and Pascal. They are absolutely brilliant.

The story of TANGLED doesn't exactly reach new heights of creativity, but then again, the story isn't what's important here. What is important is Rapunzel and her newfound freedom. Her flirtation and eventually likey-like with Flynn also isn't all that important, it's just sorta there. The foundation of TANGLED, aside from having a jolly good Disney time, is Rapunzel coming into her own, finding her place in the world, and most of all, having one heck of a fantastic personality. Rapunzel is funny, she's curious, she's strong, she's playful, and she begins to forge her own independence away from her overbearing 'Mother'. Speaking of 'Mother', what a weak villain. Yeah, she fulfilled her evil duties in the first two acts, and she went a bit nutso in the third (which I appreciated), but as far as Disney baddies go, Gothel is kinda lame.

TANGLED is funny. It's a jolly good time at the movies, and it ranks as one of Disney's best in the last few years. The trailers definitely didn't look remarkable, the plot reflects that rather accurately, too. But it's the script and characters that once again make one of these animated films far, far better and entertaining than what could have been anticipated.

That said, there is a downside: the music. Ugh. None of the songs are remotely good, and the only track in the entire film that I love is from the score by Alan Menken, "Kingdom Dance." Score aside, the songs are just - "meh" [insert a shoulder shrug here]. To make up for the lack of decent music, Disney produced one hell of a gorgeous film. Absolutely stunning. Seriously, if you have a PS3 or a Blu-Ray player, there is no better way to see TANGLED. The above screenshot is a good example of how gorgeous the whole film looks. Solid, beautiful animation.

A strong female protagonist with her own fantastic arc, two wildly expressive and hilarious animal characters, stellar animation, so-so songs, and a huge sense of fun. That's what TANGLED is. Entertaining for audiences of all ages, watch it. Pronto.

Rating: 8.5/10 = Better and funner than it has any right to be, TANGLED is a blast, and should not be missed.

26 March 2011

Banzai! 2010 Catch-Up, Part II

I think I have one more 2010 Catch-Up in me, so expect that before months end. I want to enter April completely anew without thinking of last year releases. Enjoy!


The Fighter

Starring Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Melissa Leo, Jack McGee
Written by Scott Silver, Paul Tamasy, Eric Johnson
Directed by David O. Russell
Release: 10 December 2010
Relativity Media, 115 mins., Rated R

Plot: Mickey Ward is a boxer with a crazy family life that may either be his strength or weakness.

I made a serious error in judgment with choosing not to see The Fighter until yesterday. Can't blame me, really. The trailer, the title, the poster - it all stank of those damn inspirational Disney flicks where a underdog builds himself into a legend, overcoming any and all roadblocks that may confront him and in the end, succeeds and lives his dream. I did not, and still do not, want to see another retelling of that damn story. It's no longer inspirational or 'impossible' (as the trailer for Secretariat likes us to believe), it's just redundant with no value whatsoever.

Luckily The Fighter is not this.

Yes, The Fighter is about a man overcoming obstacles and becoming something and fulfilling an ambition, but it's also about a lot more than that, and with all those elements and the interesting angle the film takes - emphasizing the family dynamic and rounded personality of our protagonist - the movie ended up exceeding my expectations and becoming an completely enjoyable film that I daresay I liked a lot.

Direction by David O. Russell, although not award worthy, is definitely worth recognition: the title shot with the speedy pullback was quite cool, the hand held cinematography (especially in the boxing scenes) worked quite well, despite being overused in films these days. As mentioned a thousand times before, Christian Bale is quite awesome as Micky's troubled brother Dicky, but frankly, I found the real powerhouse performance to be Amy Adams as Micky's love interest (and mine, too!) Charlene. Full of sass, vigor, and ass-whoopin', Charlene is a great character brilliantly brought to life by Adams. And what's more, it's Charlene who knocks some sense into Micky, who makes him take charge of his life more instead of being submissive to what his mother, Melissa Leo, and family want for him. So what it's worth, Adams is amazing in this movie. But that's not to underscore the great job Mark Wahlberg and Bale provided, cementing a brotherly love constantly tried by a crazy family, loads of cocaine use, and other really shitty events that seem to blow up in Micky's face.

I liked the emphasis on family, and Micky's attempt to go down his own path made up by his own choices, not directed by his mother or bazillion sisters who seem to speak in unison. In the end, Micky settles with needing his family involved somehow, but not being overbearing. It's the sort of development I'm not 100% behind - it seems a little backpedaling, really: a few steps forward, one step back - but it's sweet and displayed with unflinching honesty by the screenwriters and director Russell. In fact, it's the blunt honesty of everything onscreen (in addition to the fine performances) that make this movie work well.

The Fighter is not amazing, it's not something you've never seen before, but it works, and it feels fresh and original while you're watching it and never fails to keep your interest. The really odd but good-willing family dynamic and sassy performance from Adams make this movie. It's all in the title: it's not the fights, it's the fighter that's on display here, and for my two cents, it's pretty damn good.

Rating: 8/10 = A fight you can believe in.


How Do You Know

Starring Reese Witherspoon, Owen Wilson, Paul Rudd, Jack Nicholson
Written and Directed by James L. Brooks
Release: 17 December 2010
Gracie Films, 117 mins., Rated R

The first thing one should know about How Do You Know is that it is not a romantic comedy. Yes, there are moments of funny, but first and foremost, it seems to be a drama. Here we have two characters with dark, depressing lives: an 31-year old athlete (Witherspoon) who is let go from her team, and a business man being investigated for fraud and facing three years in prison (Rudd). The comedy stems from the utter disbelief off Rudd's face and, mostly, Owen Wilson's womanizing millionaire who fancies himself in "love" with Witherspoon's Lisa. But for the most part, the movie isn't funny, it's a bit confusing, and is most definitely does not adhere to expectations. For one, the characters come off extremely unlikable, particularly Lisa who seems like a bitch far more than remotely likable. Were it not for Rudd's George and his ability to sell love-struck puppy magnificently, I wouldn't have one iota of a clue that there was some sort of attraction between these two. If there's one way to sum up How Do You Know, it's unconventional. These characters' lives suck, they're either a bitch, super freaked out, or a clueless stud who is new to the whole relationship thing. And surprisingly, I was at a point where I genuinely didn't know where this story was headed. In retrospect, it's all very obvious now, but the film throws a bunch of elements into the mix that what one is expecting seems like it might not come to pass, which is a good thing. Overall, How Do You Know means well, and the actors do all they can (especially Rudd and Wilson, the true stars of the film), but it isn't successful in conveying its story, making us really fall in love or even care for these characters, and ends up being a mess moreso than an enjoyable movie.

Rating: 4/10 = Most definitely odd, misguided, and not for everyone, and very much "meh"


It's Kind of a Funny Story

Starring Keir Gilchrist, Zach Galifianakis, Emma Roberts, Viola Davis, Lauren Graham, Jim Gaffigan
Written and Directed by Anna Boden & Ryan Fleck
Release: 8 October 2010
Focus Features, 101 mins., Rated PG-13

Plot: Craig feels like he's about to burst, getting to the point where he's contemplating suicide, and checks himself into a hospital for some help in dealing with his issues.

I'm just going to be straight up: I loved It's Kind of a Funny Story, and in fact, I plan on buying it on DVD next paycheck. I don't think it's for everyone - it may seem unoriginal, a bit forced, and at times groan-worthy with the acting (particularly the lead) - but I think it all works from beginning to end, this is a solid movie with a clever script and some damn fine performances. I love this movie, and this is why:

Zack Galifianakis, for the first time ever, was restrained, not obnoxious, and actually delivered one hell of a fine performance. Zack plays Bobby, someone who establishes a friendship with our protagonist Craig (even nicknaming him 'Cool Craig') and plays a sort of mentor for Craig. Galifianakis is all about the acting here, not so much preoccupied with acting like a dumbass and bringing on the laughs - he's completely in character, and thanks to the very cool script, his character becomes just as cool and entirely memorable.

Youngsters Emma Roberts and Keir Gilchrist are great in their respective roles, Keir as Craig the awkward boy who feels boggled down by stress, and Roberts as Noelle, a girl with her own problems and ends up sparking a relationship with Craig. The chemistry and relationship between these two is fantastic, and definitely a highlight. Can't help it, I got all giddy like a girl watching The O.C. or something when these two leads were onscreen and their friendship was building.

The script is superb. Craig has quite the comical personality, full of sarcastic asides and humorous awkward moments. Craig is a teen, falls into the same teen traps: hormones, stress, need for fun, and it's all brought to screen wonderfully. Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck have written and directed a movie that accomplishes so much. It has heart, it has some great characters that are not stereotypes and are very much rounded and completely interesting, it has a nice, fast-paced story worth telling, and loads of comedy and genuine humor. It doesn't get hammy like a bloody Hallmark movie; it does say, 'hey, mental illness sucks', it's simply about a teenage boy who is going through a lot in life to the point where he's contemplating ending it, and he finds help in the friendships and relationship he starts at the hospital. It's a happy story that's told honestly in a non-corny way, and I give kudos to it for that.

Overall, just give it a chance. It's smart, it's funny, it's endearing. At the very least this will be the only time Zack BeardedMan gives a great performance, so that's definitely worth checking out, no?

Rating: 9/10 = It's Kind of a Great Movie.


My Soul to Take

Starring Max Thieriot, Denzel Whitaker, Raul Esparza, Shareeka Epps, Emily Meade, Zena Grey
Written and Directed by Wes Craven
Release: 8 October 2010
Rogue Pics, 107 mins., Rated R

Plot: The soul of a serial killer may just have implanted itself in one of the kids who were born sixteen years ago on the night its original host 'died'.

My Soul to Take is something special. It's written and directed by Wes Craven, one of the true masters of horror, and one of the directors in that field I super respect thanks to the Scream trilogy. And honestly, that's quite puzzling, cos Craven is known for some really great cinematic ventures. This is not one of them. In fact, My Soul to Take is special because it's so damn weird, so damn horribly written and acted and completely messed up, it therefore enables me to say this:

What the FRAK?

Just a word of caution: this review is going to be all over the place, because even hours later, I'm still in a state of disbelief of what I just watched. I went in expecting badness, knowing full well I would get that in spades, but what I got in addition to that is rather surprising. I went in with the expectation of something like David S. Goyer's The Invisible mixed in with a serial killer which isn't actually a serial killer but one of the kids. Well, I was sorta right, but mostly wrong. Yes, the killer does end up being a bit obvious, but whereas The Invisible but a coherent script that knew full well what it was, what direction to go, and wrote logical, dare I say dimensional characters, My Soul to Take boasts characters that I feel were written by a kid in sixth grade.

Let's take, for example, the character of Leah, or as she's known around campus "Fang". Firstly, her character comes across as a complete cartoon throughout most of the film, and it's not until the last act where she is given greater depth. Well, it just so happens that she has a sordid past that has made her act out and be generally crazy. One case that particularly left me smiling wondering what the frak was going on was when she flat out beats the shit out of her brother, Bug. And not just a bunch here or there, but something from a less spectacular kung fu movie, as she knees him in the stomach, punches him in the face, pushes him to the ground, etc., and the real kicker is Bug has no friggin' idea why the hell she's doing this or why he even bloody deserves it! Sure, it may stay in character considering Leah is a bit of a hardass, but the whole affair comes off as a hugely comical skit from a satire.

Actually, to keep with that line of thinking, I firmly believe My Soul to Take was intended as a comedy. There's no way writer/director Craven could think audiences would suck up the lame characters and lazily written 'foreshadowing' and kills and...well, just about everything that makes up a horror movie. Hell, y'know, these characters aren't bad because they're cliches - cos there's plenty of those [e.g., religious redhead nut] - but exactly because they scream of fakeyness and jocularity. Take another example: the jock of the movie gets killed by the Ripper (surprise), and as the Ripper gets his knife on he asks the jock if he wants to say goodbye to someone, and the jock replies, "my unborn child", and the Ripper says as the jock falls: "fuck you and fuck your unborn child."

This cannot be anything other than a comedy, right?

And the kills. Oh, the kills! This is a horror/slasher movie, so at the very VERY least, the kills should be the highlight, no? The moment where all the viewers in unison watch with delight as the special effects guys come up with some cool deaths with plenty of blood spraying all over the place. Well, sadly, that ain't this movie. It's as if the deaths were an afterthought. 'Oh, wait, we gotta kill this person, right?' So we have the Ripper come out of nowhere sometimes (and at one point comically yells, 'Fear yee the Ripper!' or something like that) and just slice someone's throat or knife them in the gut a whole bunch of times. It's not brutal like, say, the Scream franchise, it instead just comes across as lazy. I would be a bit more okay with that if we at the very least cared about the characters, had one iota of connection to them. Instead, they literally are just cardboard things to be killed and taken off the board.

And let's talk about the lead. Max Thieriot is Bug, the protagonist, who the Ripper is primarily targeting because of who he is. I know that's vague, but Bug's past is one of the very few things the movie has going for it, so I'll conceal that little bit here. Thieriot delivers his lines so, so horribly. Imagine a braindead zombie, or a teenage boy who had his brain liquefied or lobotomized, and that's exactly how Thieriot sounds. The thing is, Thieriot is actually pretty damn good at mimicking the voices of his deceased co-stars (apparently their souls are apart of him, now, for some reason or another), so it's odd that he's impressive in that regard, but absolutely lacks any acting talent when it comes to his solo lines. Bloody hell, y'know?

One last note: I can't fathom how on earth 3-D would have helped this movie. At no point did it appear that Craven made a effort to show off the 3-D technique, with no special camera angles or somethingorrather heading straight towards the lens. Nada. Zilch. It was a regular 2D movie with 2D visuals, and I have very little doubt those who chose the 3-D option were a tad disappointed by the lack of 'awe' factor.

In conclusion, My Soul to Take is a train wreck of a movie (hehe, train wreck; and the next review is about a train...that wrecks...hehehe), but miraculously, it was fun. Everything is written so horribly, from the characters and plot to the dialogue, it's all one big mess, and definitely a black spot in Craven's resume (here's hoping Scream 4 kicks ass). So if you're in the mood for a wickedly bad time and some laughs on the side, My Soul to Take is for you!

Rating: 4.5/10 = I'm appalled and yet can't look away.


Unstoppable

Starring Denzel Washington, Chris Pine, Rosario Dawson, Ethan Suplee
Written by Mark Bomback
Directed by Tony Scott
Release: 12 November 2010
Telecino Cinema, 98 mins., Rated PG-13

Let's be honest here: the real star of Unstoppable is the train. After all, that's what people came to see, and in that regard, Tony Scott delivers. The train zooms, the train BOOMs, and the train causes a look of ruckus and chaos. The characters Denzel Washington and Chris Pine play are just there to be the saving grace at the end of the day, but really, they're one-dimensional puppets placed here and there in order to bring the desired outcome into fruition. Attempts at creating character is given in-between Scott's trademark quick cuts and circling shots, but they don't overall add up to anything substantial. But like I said, we're not here for characters, we're here to experience this motherfrakking train be motherfrakking unstoppable. And oh yes, it does do that. Thanks to Tony Scott, the only director who could have pulled off this "missile the size of the Chrysler building" story, the visuals of the train are spectacular, the scenes of Denzel and Chris racing to save the day intense (especially in the third act), and the enjoyment factor major high.

Rating: 5/10 = Look at things go BOOM! Wait, hold it, character moment for a sec. Okay, good, time for more BOOM! Did you see that BOOM!? There was a BOOM!

20 March 2011

Banzai! 2010 Catch-Up, Part I

So I still have some 2010 titles to watch and review and hope to finish 'em all up by months end, so here's part one of (most likely) three. Cheers!


127 Hours

Starring James Franco, Kara Mara, Amber Tamblyn
Script by Danny Boyle, Simon Beaufoy
Directed by Danny Boyle
Release: 5 November 2010
Fox Searchlight, 94 mins., Rated R

Plot: Aron Ralston has the misfortune of getting his hand wedged against a very tough rock.

A couple of weeks ago I nominated The King's Speech as one of my top ten favorite movies of last year; I feel, now, that may have been premature. Danny Boyle's 127 Hours is one hell of a unforgettable ride, boasting a performance from Franco that is nothing short of a revelation, and Boyle's trademark stunning and in-your-face direction. And dare I forget mentioning A.R. Rahman returning to compose the score. Whereas King's Speech was generally good, 127 Hours is mesmerizing, intense, full of boundless creativity, and highly dramatic and engaging.

First, James Franco is generally a very good actor. I liked him in the Spider-Man trilogy, I loved him in Pineapple Express, and he's interesting enough that my interest was peaked with his whole soap opera guest star stint. So, I liked the guy, and thought he was talented. Enter 127 Hours, and I'm friggin' blown away. For a movie where the central actor - the dude the camera is glued to through the entire film - is pinned into one location, unable to really move all that much, one would think, Hey, this movie is getting a bit dull. That doesn't happen here. Thanks to Boyle (and I'll get to that shortly) and Franco, not a single iota of dullness or watch-checking. Franco sells Aron Ralston. Aron doesn't come off as a prick who doesn't leave a note, Aron is a man who seeks adventure, and wants to have a bit of crazy, impulsive fun. We identify with him, we get to know him deeply - his feelings (presented to us by confessions to his video camera), his past - through conversations with himself or some super nifty hallucinations (SCOOBY-DOO!!!). Look, I can't praise Franco enough, and his nod from the Academy was perfectly justified. It's a performance that needs to be seen - and to some extent, experienced - to believe.

Next to actor Franco, the real gem - if not the hugest biggest reason for the movie's success - is director/co-writer Danny Boyle. A few years ago he came out with some flick called Slumdog Millionaire, and from then on, I've been surfing through his career of movies. Pretty impressive. Also has one hell of a impressive visual style. A story like this demands that type of style, and Boyle doesn't disappoint. Before Aron is pinned down, Boyle gives us sweeping shots of the National Park in Utah, absolutely gorgeous stuff. And then the event (#1) happens, and naturally, it would appear that camera angles would be a bit constricted. Not for Boyle. Every camera angle imaginable, and then some, is used to great effect. Zooms, hand held work, P.O.V.s, crane shots, etc. All magnificent, all absolutely drawing me into the situation. When The Event (#2) comes about - that thing everyone never fails to mention - it's depicted without shying away of the horror, out of the sheer strength of will in the situation; it's brutal and victorious all at the same time. And we owe all our feelings, all of our intense interest on what's happening on two people: James and Danny.

127 Hours is can't miss filmmaking. Compelling story, engaging tour de force performance, and unforgettable. You may not leave the movie feeling like you just learned something so giantly monumental, but frankly, not like you get anything out of King's Speech but a feel good atmosphere overcomin' ya momentarily. It's unfair to compare the two, but when it comes right down to it, I would exchange King's Speech with 127 Hours. Watch it. Experience it. Love it.


Best Worst Movie

Featuring George Hardy, Michael Stephenson, Darren Ewing, Jason Steadman, Jason Wright, Claudio Fragasso, Percy Gioia
Directed by Michael Stephenson
Release: 14 April 2010 (wide)
New Video Group, 93 mins., Not Rated

Plot: A look into the cult classic Troll 2 and its status as the "best worst movie ever made."

I love me some Troll 2. I can't picture anyone not finding themselves having a hugely enjoyable time when watching it, solo or in a group. Instead of examining how this cult classic came to be made and all that behind the scenes stuff, Best Worst Movie concentrates on the individuals who made the film and what has come of them today, their reactions to their film being considered the "best worst movie ever made", and the film's general status by film lovers around the world. The documentary isn't as revealing or engaging as I had hoped, but it does lend itself to some interesting tidbits: Italian director Claudio Fragasso (pictured above), who helmed Troll 2, is absolutely adamant he crafted a damn good movie and Americans just don't appreciate it's strong points and, furthermore, 'message'; actress Margo Prey and her odd "complicated" life; George Hardy's general anonymity back home and goodwill towards men attitude, etc. The lives of the folks who helped realize Troll 2 is rather fascinating, and, at times, a little depressing, but director Stephenson doesn't throw in sad music or poke fun at Margo's obvious...er, complications...it's very direct, just shows how things are without making judgments.

Well, can't really say that about George Hardy. That man attends a horror convention or two, and is quite judgmental about the current state of horror films and, furthermore, actors and actresses charging $30-50 for a photo and autograph for films they barely starred in.

And Claudio is very vocal about his displeasure concerning certain actors.

To sum up Best Worst Movie, it's that it is interesting. Not mandatory viewing by any means, but a nice little update about the actors involved in the films production, its status right now as the best worst movie, and most importantly - revealing plans for a Troll 2, Part 2. I know, I know, retain the excitement. Overall, can't highly recommend it, but for parties interested in more details about Troll 2 and how bizarre the lives of some of the actors currently are, definitely give it a look.


Catfish


Featuring Nev Schulman, Henry Joost, Ariel Schulman
Directed by Henry Joost & Ariel Schulman
Release: 17 September 2010
Rogue Pictures, 86 mins., Rated PG-13

Plot: Nev sparks a Facebook friendship with some eight-year old girl named Abbey, but slowly spots inconsistencies in the friendship that leads to a shocking revelation (!).

The trailers and posters indicate some sort of horror twisty vibe at the end as Nev Schulman's investigation of these mysterious "Abbey" and "Megan" lead him to a abandoned house (above). And I was frankly looking forward to that. But what we get instead is much more real, and, as commonly been stated, a perfect example of the dangers of Facebook and internet commingling. However, major kudos to the marketing department. The ads certainly peaked my interest.

The Social Network was about the creation of thefacebook, about the destruction of a tightly bound friendship over money and backstabbingness. Catfish uses facebook and shows that anyone can be anything they want. It's a useful lesson to know, and will definitely prevent the shenanigans that go down here.

I'm frankly at a loss as to what to say concerning Catfish. Yes, it does indeed show the dangers of social networking, the risks involved for people deciding to meet someone they haven't officially physically met, as well as the sad idea that some folks create alternate lives through the internet instead of coping with the one they have. Nev and his producing/directing partners are a delight, wise-cracking and intelligent. They know what they're doing, they know the risks involved, but their curiosity is far too high to let it go, and therefore we have this documentary, real or not. The one expected thing is that I ended up being a little choked up near the end when all is said and done, but it also became a little bit fascinating. Lie after lie made up to protect another lie. Relating instead of exploiting the lies.

It's a interesting (faux, if you wish) documentary and recommended to all.


Due Date

Starring Robert Downey Jr., Zach Galifianakis, Michelle Monaghan, Juliette Lewis, Jamie Foxx
Written by Todd Phillips, Alan R. Cohen, Alan Freedland, Adam Sztykiel
Directed by Todd Phillips
Release: 5 November 2010
Legendary Pics, 95 mins., Rated R

Plot: Peter (Downey) is late for meeting his wife, who is quite prego, and is forced to go on a car ride with the weird bearded man who got him into this situation in the first place, Ethan (Galifianakis).

I was hoping for a lot of laughs, like The Hangover provided, but instead I gave a chuckle here or there. Now, The Hangover isn't comedy gold like the common misconception seems to be, but it did have plenty of funny moments. Due Date, by comparison, doesn't work as well; which is odd, because the two film are quite similar in many respects, so it's a shame it doesn't succeed. As expected, Robert Downey, Jr. is funny, intense, and brings about most of the laughs whenever they happen. And, as expected, Zack's routine was tired and redundant. I'm getting to a point where I'd rather take another string of Michael Cera productions over seeing the Bearded One yet again. I apologize to any fans of Zack Galifianakis. The first hour I didn't find all that amusing, although I did enjoy bits with Peter and Ethan at the rest stop, and I'm embarrassed to say I did chuckle at the masturbating dog, but it wasn't until the whole Mexican border incident that I really got into the flick, and by then, it was almost over. The inevitable resolution doesn't ring all too true - the idea that these two dudes strike up a messed up friendship at the end seems not all that likely considering Ethan is obnoxious, instigated this whole mess, and put a bullet in Peter's leg. Not exactly someone I want to spend my free time with. Overall, I didn't enjoy Due Date as much as I expected to, and in all likelihood I won't be checking it out again anytime in the near future. The flick is one of those movies where it appeals to a certain sect of people, and to the other, they get my general feeling: which is, very "meh."


Faster

Starring Dwayne Johnson, Billy Bob Thornton, Carla Gugino, Moon Bloodgood, Oliver Jackson-Cohen, Maggie Grace, Mike Epps, Jennifer Carpenter
Written by Tony & Joe Gayton
Directed by George Tillman, Jr.
Release: 24 November 2010
TriStar, 98 mins., Rated R

Plot: Driver (Johnson) intends to execute everyone on his list of people who had a hand in his brother's death. Result: it ain't gonna be pretty.

FASTER has no misconception of what it is: a revenge action movie with Dwayne Johnson looking very, very pissed off and very, very much an unstoppable, relentless force that has only one function: kill the people involved in the murder of his brother (and drying really fast, too). Therefore, I’m not going to spend the time critiquing the movie as I normally would, but simply say that FASTER delivers on its premise one hundred percent. Dwayne’s stone cold eyes, full of anger and adrenaline is friggin’ intense, and the scenes where he does, indeed, take out his revenge is sweet, satisfying, and full of expected carnage. Billy Bob is Billy Bob, and everyone excels at their perspective roles. The bloodfest of revenge is even given a bit of dark humor as Billy deals with life issues and an assassin with a heart consumed with love decides to pop the question to Maggie Grace. FASTER is one hell of a joyride, and if you’re in the mood for a good action movie, look no further. Dwayne Johnson is back in the type of role he perfects, and as a result, an already good movie becomes great fun.